Today, TV channels show more men’s sports than women’s sports.
Why is this the case?
Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
SAMPLE ANSWER
These days, there is a significant difference between men and women’s sports coverage on television channels. I believe that women’s sports should get just as much coverage as men’s, and will outline my reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, there are many reasons for the dominance of men over women’s sports programs on TV. Due to a large proportion of male sports viewers, TV channels tend to produce sports programs for men to maximize their ratings and profits. Take football as an example. When entering a coffee shop, it is easy to catch groups of men having discussions about a recent men’s football match, while women show greater preference for shopping or lifestyle channels. Besides, because men usually perform better than women in sports such as boxing and bodybuilding, they play at a much higher level, which makes men’s sports more exciting to watch.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that it is necessary for TV channels to provide equal coverage for both genders. First, it creates gender equality in society and increases the rate of women’s sports participation. In fact, every time women go out on the field, they give it their all knowing that their best will likely go unnoticed. Therefore, just like men, female athletes should receive full recognition for their effort. Secondly, better TV coverage also enables women to make money off from endorsements and enhance their living standard. That is to say, more TV exposure for the female players will lead to major deals with endorsers and higher salaries in the future through advertising contracts.
In conclusion, why women’s sports shows do not receive enough coverage in this day and age results from those aforementioned reasons, and I truly believe that it is necessary to ensure equal coverage of women’s sports.
[…] Answer here […]